Aspen bark is generally smooth, and unlike many other tree species, retains a strongly photosynthetic capability even into maturity.
Rough bark is produced as a defense mechanism – protection from mechanical wounds, colonization by pathogens and other types of damage. The extent to which the rough bark is produced may depend on the underlying genetics of the clone, and its susceptibility to invasion (I have yet to prove or disprove this – it’s currently only a hypothesis based on observations).
The abundance of smooth bark is one of the physical traits I investigated in five wild-growing Scottish clones over the course of this PhD. Specifically, do clones growing on the same site differ in this particular trait? Generally, yes (see fig.1 below).

Figure 1: % cover of smooth bark (with SE bars) for five aspen clones at Invertromie (RSPB Insh Marshes, nr. Kingussie, Cairngorms National Park, Scotland).
A generaized linear mixed model confirmed significant differences and separated the five clones into three groups based on these differences: red/green (BD11/BD12); grey (BD13); white/blue (BD14/BD5).
So why is this interesting? More on that in another post.



